- Published on
Cubic Sums Bound a Quartic Term
- Authors

- Name
- Vu Hung
Problem Statement
Prove by induction that for all integers :
Hints
This is a "sandwich" inequality with two parts:
- LHS inequality: (needs induction)
- RHS inequality: (can be proven directly)
Recall:
For the LHS induction step, you'll need to show , which simplifies to .
Solutions
Part 1: RHS Inequality (Direct Proof)
Show for .
Using the sum formula:
We need:
This simplifies to:
Since , this is clearly true. RHS proven. \checkmark
Part 2: LHS Inequality (Induction)
Prove for .
Base case ():
Inductive hypothesis: Assume for some .
Inductive step: Prove .
Need to show:
Equivalently:
Expand RHS:
So we need:
Simplifies to:
This is true for all . \checkmark
By induction, LHS proven. Combining both parts, the full sandwich inequality holds.
Takeaways
- Reconstruct the full proof from the hint and the solution outline, and justify every transformation explicitly.
- Check edge cases and verify where each assumption is used in the argument.
Further Readings
If you found this proof interesting, be sure to check out these relevant HSC booklets to sharpen your reasoning skills:
- HSC Proofs: https://vumaths.com/booklets/hsc-proofs/
- HSC Distributions: https://vumaths.com/booklets/hsc-distributions/
- HSC Complex Numbers: https://vumaths.com/booklets/hsc-complex-numbers/
Connect with me
If you're eager for more HSC Maths insights, be sure to check out my Substack. For deeper dives and regular tips, join my GitHub. Let's tackle these challenging math problems together! You can also catch my daily math content on YouTube - HSC Maths Extension 1+2.
